Categories · Scraping & Crawling APIs
Firecrawl vs Zyte API
Firecrawl and Zyte API are both Scraping & Crawling APIs, compared here on pricing, compliance, capabilities, and developer experience from structured, cited data - not reviews or paid placement. Firecrawl offers a free tier while Zyte API does not, so Firecrawl is easier to trial before committing. On compliance, Firecrawl additionally documents SOC 2. Firecrawl supports webhooks for event-driven integration; the other does not document them. For coding-agent use, Firecrawl scores higher on agent-friendliness (65 vs 55).
Comparedby a transparent data-readiness score computed from each API's published, sourced fields. No reviews, no paid placement. How we rank.
Data last verified 2026-06-06, with every field cited on each profile.
Head-to-head, from published, cited fields (auto-generated; no paid placement)| Field | Firecrawl | Zyte API |
|---|
| Starting price | $16 month | $0.06 1,000 successful responses |
|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription | Hybrid |
|---|
| Free tier | ✓ | ✗ |
|---|
| Self-serve signup | ✓ | ✓ |
|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II | ? |
|---|
| HIPAA | · | · |
|---|
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
|---|
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
|---|
| Sandbox | ✗ | ✗ |
|---|
| Documented actions | 10 | 22 |
|---|
Full data and citations: Firecrawl · Zyte API. See more Scraping & Crawling APIs.