Categories · Subscription & Billing APIs
Lago vs Recurly
Lago and Recurly are both Subscription & Billing APIs, compared here on pricing, compliance, capabilities, and developer experience from structured, cited data - not reviews or paid placement. Lago offers a free tier while Recurly does not, so Lago is easier to trial before committing. On compliance, Recurly additionally documents HIPAA. For coding-agent use, Lago scores higher on agent-friendliness (75 vs 40).
Comparedby a transparent data-readiness score computed from each API's published, sourced fields. No reviews, no paid placement. How we rank.
Data last verified 2026-06-21, with every field cited on each profile.
Head-to-head, from published, cited fields (auto-generated; no paid placement)| Field | Lago | Recurly |
|---|
| Starting price | - | $249 month |
|---|
| Pricing model | Sales-led | Hybrid |
|---|
| Free tier | ✓ | ✗ |
|---|
| Self-serve signup | ✓ | ✓ |
|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II | Type II |
|---|
| HIPAA | · | ✓ |
|---|
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
|---|
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
|---|
| Sandbox | ✓ | ✓ |
|---|
| Documented actions | 53 | 37 |
|---|
Full data and citations: Lago · Recurly. See more Subscription & Billing APIs.